Is the Apocrypha Canonical?
Rev.
Angus Stewart
Protestantism
and Roman Catholicism agree regarding the canon of the New Testament (NT), but
Roman Catholicism also includes the Apocrypha (Tobit, I and II Maccabees, Judith
etc.) in the Old Testament (OT) canon, unlike Protestantism.
The
apostle Paul declares that “the oracles of God” were “committed” to the
Jewish OT church (Rom. 3:2), which never considered the apocryphal books as
canonical. If the Apocrypha were “inspired,” as Rome claims (Catechism of
the Catholic Church, paragraphs 120, 138), Christ and His apostles (who were
faithful in rebuking the Jews for sins of doctrine and life) would surely not
have failed to reprove them. Instead, Christ endorsed their canon with its
threefold division: “the law of Moses,” “the prophets” and “the
psalms” (Luke 24:44).
The
apocryphal books were written later than the OT books; after the last of the OT
prophets; and in Greek and not in Hebrew, the language of the OT. Moreover,
their style and matter proclaims them to be merely human, and not divine,
compositions. For example, II Maccabees ends, “And if I have written well and
to the point in my story, this is what I myself desired; but if meanly and
indifferently, this is all I could attain unto” (15:38). Hardly the words of
an inspired penman!
Roman
Catholic apologist, Patrick McCafferty asserts that Tobit 4:15 (“what thou
thyself hatest, do to no man”) is “quoted” by Christ in Matthew 7:12
(“Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye
even so to them;” cf. Luke 6:31). First, this is hardly a quote and certainly
not literal. Note the difference in the length of the two quotes, and that
whereas Tobit is negative (telling us what we must not do), Christ’s command
is positive (telling us what we must do). Second, Christ does not indicate that
this is a citation, whether of Tobit or anything else. Third, the quotation of a
passage does not of itself prove a book to be canonical, for the NT even quotes
pagan writers: Aratus, Menander and Epimenedes (Acts 17:28; I Cor. 15:33; Titus
1:12).
Moreover,
Tobit contains errors and superstitions incompatible with God’s revealed Word.
Raphael, a holy angel (12:15), lies that he is Azariah, the son of Ananias
(5:12). The angel gives magical directions for driving away a demon by the smoke
of a fish’s liver and heart (6:7), contrary to Christ (“this kind goeth not
out but by prayer and fasting;” Matt. 17:21).
God-breathed
OT and NT Scripture alone is the test of all tradition and doctrines (Acts
17:11; I John 4:1). Faithful interpretation and application of God’s Word
(apostolic tradition) in the true church as summed in early ecumenical and
Reformed creeds must be held fast (II Thess. 2:15). That tradition (including
Roman Catholic tradition) which is merely the “doctrines” and
“commandments of men” which makes “the Word of God of none effect” (Mark
7:7, 13) must be rejected. The true church holds up the truth of Jesus Christ
before the world by proclaiming and defending the doctrines of God-breathed
Scripture alone, and thus it is “the pillar and ground of the truth” (I Tim.
3:15). |