The Historical Use of the Psalms
Basil the Great (c.330-379) bishop of Caesarea, author of a
famous work on the Holy Spirit: “He devised for us these harmonious
melodies of the psalms, that they who are children in age or even those
who are youthful in disposition might to all appearances chant but, in
reality, become trained in soul. For, never has any one of the many
indifferent persons gone away easily holding in mind either an apostolic
or prophetic message, but they do chant the words of the psalms even in
the home, and they spread them around in the market place, and if
perchance someone becomes exceedingly wrathful, when he begins to be
soothed by the psalm, he departs with the wrath of his soul immediately
lulled to sleep by means of the melody.”
Synod of Laodicea (343-381), canon LIX: “No psalms composed by
private individuals nor any uncanonical books may be read in the church,
but only the Canonical Books of the Old and New Testaments.”
John Chrysostom (c.347-407) bishop of Constantinople, the
golden-mouthed preacher: “The grace of the Holy Ghost hath so ordered
it, that the Psalms of David should be recited and sung night and day.
In the Church’s vigils—in the morning—at funeral solemnities—the
first, the midst, and the last is David. In private houses, where
virgins spin—in the monasteries—in the deserts, where men converse
with God—the first, the midst, and the last is David. In the night,
when men sleep, he wakes them up to sing; and collecting the servants of
God into angelic troops, turns earth into heaven, and of men makes
angels, chanting David’s Psalms.”
The Preface to The Bay Psalm Book (1640), the first book to be
printed in New England: “… certainly the singing of David’s psalms
was an acceptable worship of God, not only in his, but in succeeding
times, as in Solomon’s time (II Chron. 5:13) in Jehoshaphat’s time
(II Chron. 20:21) in Ezra’s time (Ezra 3:10-11) and the text is
evident in Hezekiah’s time they are commanded to sing praise in the
words of David and Asaph (II Chron. 29:30) … the whole Church is
commanded to teach one another in all the several sorts of David’s
psalms, some being called by himself Mizmorim: psalms, some Tehillim:
hymns, some Shirim: spiritual songs. So that if the singing of David’s
psalms be a moral duty and therefore perpetual; then we under the New
Testament are bound to sing them as well as they under the Old: and …
we are expressly commanded to sing Psalms, Hymns, and Spiritual Songs
(Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16) …”
Westminster Confession of Faith (1640s) 21:5:
“The reading of the Scriptures with godly fear; the sound preaching,
and conscionable hearing of the word, in obedience unto God, with
understanding, faith, and reverence; singing of psalms with grace in the
heart; as also the due administration and worthy receiving of the
sacraments instituted by Christ; are all parts of the ordinary religious
worship of God: besides religious oaths and vows, solemn fastings, and
thanksgivings upon special occasions, which are, in their several times
and seasons, to be used in a holy and religious manner.”
The Westminster Directory for Public Worship of God
(1640s)
“Of Singing of Psalms:
It is the duty of
Christians to praise God publickly, by singing of psalms together in the
congregation, and also privately in the family.
In singing of
psalms, the voice is to be tenably and gravely ordered; but the chief
care must be to sing with understanding, and with grace in the heart,
making melody unto the Lord.
That the whole
congregation may join herein, every one that can read is to have a psalm
book; and all others, not disabled by age or otherwise, are to be
exhorted to learn to read. But for the present, where many in the
congregation cannot read, it is convenient that the minister, or some
other fit person appointed by him and the other ruling officers, do read
the psalm, line by line, before the singing thereof.”
John Lightfoot (1602-1675) member of the Westminster
Assembly: “The constant and ordinary psalms that [the Jews] sang were
these:
On the first day of the week, the Four-and-twentieth Psalm, The earth is
the Lord’s and the fullness thereof, etc.
On the second day of the week, the Forty-eighth Psalm, Great is the
Lord, and greatly to be praised in the city of God, etc.
On the third day, the Eighty-second Psalm, God standeth in the
congregation of the mighty, and judgeth among the gods, etc.
On the fourth day, the Ninety-fourth Psalm, O Lord God, to whom
vengeance belongeth, etc.
On the fifth day, the Eighty-first Psalm, Sing aloud unto God our
strength, make a joyful noise unto the God of Jacob, etc.
On the sixth day of the week, the Ninety-third Psalm, The Lord reigneth,
He is clothed with majesty, etc.
On the Sabbath-day they sang the Ninety-second Psalm, which bears the
title of A Psalm or song for the Sabbath-day.
These were the
known and constant and fixed psalms that the singers sang, and the music
played to, on the several days of the week …
This saying over of the Hallel is acknowledge by the Jews to be an
institution of the scribes; and the reason of the picking out of these
psalms for that purpose was because of their beginning or ending with
Hallelujah, and partly because they contain, not only so high and
eminent memorials of God’s goodness and deliverance unto Israel …
but also several other things of high and important matter and
consideration; for the Hallel, say they, recordeth five things: the
coming out of Egypt, the dividing of the sea, the giving of the law, the
resurrection of the dead, and the lot of Messias.”
Wilhelmus A Brakel (1635-1711): "The decision of the Dutch
Synods has been very correct indeed, namely, that none other but the
Psalms of David are to be used in the churches" (The
Christian's Reasonable Service, trans. Bartel Elshout [USA:
Soli Deo Gloria, 1995], vol. 4, pp. 34-35).
Professor William Dool Killen (1806-1902) Irish
Presbyterian: “Influential Bishops sometimes introduced them
[uninspired hymns] by their own authority, but the practice was regarded
with suspicion and seems to have been considered irregular. In
confirmation of this statement it may be added that the Antioch Council
(267) condemned Paul of Samosata for ‘discontinuing the Psalms
formerly used, and for establishing a new and very exceptionable
hymnology;’ and the Council of Laodicea (c.381) decreed that
‘private or unauthorised Psalms ought not to be used in the
Church.’”
Dr. Philip Schaff, American church historian (1819-1893):
(1) The “Book of Psalms is the oldest Christian Hymn Book; inherited
from the ancient covenant … The Councils of Laodicea (360) and of
Chalcedon (451) prohibited the ecclesiastical use of all uninspired or
private hymns.”
(2) “[The church] long adhered almost exclusively to the Psalms of
David, who, as Chrysostom says, was first, middle, and last in the
assemblies of the Christians; and it had, in opposition to heretical
predilections, even a decided aversion to the public use of uninspired
songs. The Council of Laodicea, about 360, prohibited even the
ecclesiastical use of all uninspired or ‘private hymns,’ and the
Council of Chalcedon in 451 confirmed this decree.”
Professor William Binnie, Scottish Presbyterian (1823-1886):
(1) “The singing of the Hallel by Christ and the eleven in the
guest-chamber on the night of His betrayal, may be said to mark the
point at which the Psalter passed over form the old dispensation into
the New: for it accompanied the celebration of the new ordinance of the
Lord’s Supper as well as the celebration of the expiring Passover.
Thenceforward, it is assumed that at every gathering of Christians for
mutual edification, some one will ‘have a Psalm’ to give out to be
sung.”
(2) “After an interval of four centuries, the Spirit of inspiration
spoke again by the evangelists and apostles; but no Psalmist was raised
up in the apostolical Church. The New Testament contains books of
history, of doctrine, and of prophecy; but it contains no book of
Psalms.”
Rev. Hugh Brown (1859) American Presbyterian: “…scripture
psalmody has been used in every period of the church from the days of
Christ and his Apostles down to the present time. The most learned and
orthodox commentators agree that the hymn sung by our Saviour and his
Apostles at the institution of the Lord’s Supper was the Hallel which
consisted of six inspired Psalms, from the 113th to the 118th inclusive.
And that the book of psalms was used exclusively in the apostolic
period, we have indubitable evidence, but if hymns of human composition
were then used by the church of Christ, we demand any to produce such,
or give proof for it. After the death of the Apostles, and in the 2nd
century, the church departed in several respects form its former purity.
Still we find that scripture psalmody was used. Tertullian positively
asserts, that in the 2nd century, the 133rd Psalm was regularly sung at
the administration of the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper. Respecting
the 3rd century, history says little on the subject of psalmody; but as
Irenaeas, Tertullian, and others of the 2nd century, flourished in the
beginning of the 3rd, we have every reason to believe that the practice
of the preceding was the same.
But that the book of Psalms was used by the church in the 4th century,
we have incontrovertible evidence. Jerome of Palestine tells us that the
31st and 45th Psalms were sung at the celebration of the Lord’s
Supper; and Cyril of Jerusalem, who lived in the same age, affirms the
same thing. Jerome likewise says, ‘You could not go into the fields
but you might hear the ploughman at his hallelujahs, and the
vine-dresser chanting the Psalms of David.’ Augustine also testifies
to the using the book of Psalms in worship from the aspersions of its
enemies. He says, as we see in Calvin’s Institutes, book 3, chapter
20. ‘One Hilary took every opportunity of loading with censures the
practice, that hymns from the book of Psalms, should be sung at the
altar. But in obedience to the command of my brethren I answered him.’
And again, we are told in Epistle 119, Tome 2, that ‘the Donatists
reproached the orthodox, because they sung with sobriety the divine
songs of the prophets, while they [the Donatists] influenced their minds
with the poetic effusions of human genius.’ Augustine also informs us,
that Athanasius of Alexandria employed the Psalms of David in his
church, and the same is affirmed of Ambrose. In the ‘Apostolic
Constitution,’ which appeared in the 4th century, it is said in Book
2, chapter 57, that ‘the women, the children, and humblest mechanics,
could repeat all the Psalms of David; they chanted them at home and
abroad.’ Again we find Chrysostom, the orthodox patriarch of
Constantinople, in Homily 6, saying; ‘All Christians employ themselves
in David’s Psalms more frequently than in any other part of the Old or
New Testament. And collecting the servants of God into angelic troops,
turns earth into heaven, and of men makes angels, chanting David’s
Psalms.’ Again, in the 5th century we find Cassian in Book 3, chapter
6 saying, ‘The elders have not changed the ancient custom of singing
psalms. For the hymns which it has been the custom to sing at the end of
the night-vigils, were the same hymns which they sing at this day, viz.:
the 148th, and following Psalms, the 50th, 62nd, and 89th.’ This then
is conclusive testimony, and from it we see three things: (1) That
Scripture Psalms were sung in worship in the 5th century; (2) That these
Psalms were also used in the foregoing centuries, for it is called an
‘ancient custom,’ and (3) The term hymns in the writings of the
Fathers mean the Psalms of David, or Scripture Psalmody. But farther,
Suidas in his Lexicon on the word, chorus, tells us, that ‘The choirs
of churches were, between the years 337 and 404 divided into parts, who,
in the time of Flavian of Antioch, sung the Psalms of David
alternately.’ Also, the council of Laodicea in the year 364, decreed,
that no unauthorized Psalms should be used in the church; and in the
second at Graga, in Spain, in the beginning of the 7th century forbid
the use of all hymns except those of divine inspiration … The
Waldenses long before the days of the Reformation, in the valleys of
Piedmont, and amid the Alpine hills sung Scripture Psalms …”
Mr. Moll (1869) German: “The Psalter is … the Hymn Book of
the Hebrew Church, originally and primarily designed for use in the
Public Worship of God.”
Dr. Grier: “There is no more sheer assumption in all
theological controversy than that the Early Church made and sang their
own hymns.”
John McNaugher: “It is the oldest hymn-book in existence,
having a connected record through thousands of years down to our own
times, and it is consecrated forever as having been the hymnary of our
Saviour and of the Apostolic Church. In the light of its age-long
history, of its rich poetry, of its unsectarian, catholic character, of
its freedom from error, of its well-proportioned thought, of its
theological depth and spiritual quality, of its wealth of evangelical
matter, of its supremacy in the utterance of devotion and religious
experience, and of the unexampled strains in which it celebrates the
glories of God, there is ample occasion for the plea that the Churches
of Christ recognize in the Psalter their heritage of sacred song, as
against a human hymnody with its necessary imperfections.”
Rev. W. E. McCulloch, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: “… ours are
the songs of Solomon’s Temple, of Christ and His Apostles; the songs
sung by martyrs amid the Roman Catacombs, by Waldenses among the
fastnesses of the Alps, by the Huguenots who baptized the soil of France
with their blood, by the Swiss and the Hollanders and the Germans of
Reformation times, by the Covenanters on the hillsides and in the
mountain caves of Scotland, by the Pilgrim Fathers who dared the terrors
of the sea and the savage wilderness; the songs sung by saintly souls
through the ages; the songs of the inspired Psalter, whose whole
sentiment may be summed up in its final exhortation, ‘Let everything
that hath breath praise the Lord.’”
Rev. George W. Robinson, D. D., Allegheny, Pennsylvania: “The
Psalms in America are a part of the national heritage, since they were
so closely identified with its early history, wrought so mightily into
the lives of those who made it, and have entered so largely into the
religious experience and practice of the people from the first day to
this. In the hour when the Pilgrim Fathers were about to sail from
Leyden, not in quest of the Golden Fleece, not in search of the fabled
wealth, but to find a haven of liberty and lay the foundations of a
mighty nation, kneeling on the sands of Delft Haven, after prayer by the
minister commending them to the God of the winds and the waves, they all
joined in singing Luther’s favourite Psalm, the Forty-Sixth,
‘God will our strength and refuge prove,
In all distress a present aid;
Though waters roar and troubled be,
We will not fear or be dismayed,’
And then sailed away in the Speedwell. To the strains of a similar Psalm
the Mayflower spread her sails for her perilous journey across the seas.
Arriving at the shores of the New World on the Sabbath, a day holy to
the Lord among these Puritans, they spent the day aboard the ship in the
customary acts of religious worship, a part of which was the singing of
the Psalms. Thus the first sacred song that ever went echoing along that
‘rock-bound coast,’ or broke the stillness of the slumbering
forests, was one of the old Hebrew Psalms with which David, twenty-five
centuries before, was accustomed to waken the echoes amid the hills and
valleys of Judea.”