On the Supervision of the Lord's Table: Close
Communion (John Calvin)
A letter from John Calvin on the elders’
supervision of the Lord’s table:
"Dearest brothers, since this letter largely
relates to individual churches in your midst, we have decided that the
most convenient thing to do is to give you our letter to share. We are
doing this not so much to avoid labour as to avoid expending so many
words uselessly in individual letters, and especially to convince you
that we are not saying one thing in one letter and something else in
another. We want our consensus to be made known to all equally.
We hear that certain people are displeased when they
are questioned about their faith in order that, if they are found to be
poorly instructed in the faith, they may be denied admittance to the
Lord’s Supper until they have made better progress. To those who are
displeased by this strictness of yours, we say that they should not
indulge their wickedness or seek indulgence in a matter that concerns
their destruction. The apostle’s opinion ought to be well known among
Christians, that anyone who eats the Lord’s bread unworthily is
considered sacrilegious [1 Cor. 11:27]. For a person to use the
bread worthily requires that he should examine himself; the apostle
teaches quite clearly that those who are incapable of examining
themselves should not approach that table.
Anyone, therefore, who approaches the Lord’s Supper
heedlessly, without being instructed beforehand in the faith, arouses
God’s anger. Those who are forbidden to approach it for this reason
have nothing to complain of, since their salvation is being protected.
If everyone were wise, everyone could be his own judge; but because many
pay too little attention to themselves, it is expedient that the
church have a definite procedure so that it never fails to prevent the
sacraments from being profaned.
For everyone to be admitted to the Lord’s
Supper, without distinction or selection, is a sign of contempt that the
Lord cannot endure. The Lord himself distributed the supper to his
disciples only. Therefore anyone not instructed in the doctrine of the
gospel ought not to approach what the Lord has instituted. No one should
be distressed when his Christianity is examined even down to the finest
point when he is to be admitted to the Lord’s Supper. It should be
established as part of the total state and system of discipline that
ought to flourish in the church that those who are judged unworthy
should not be admitted.
We know this seems novel to those who do not maintain
a distinction between the yoke of our Lord Jesus Christ and the tyranny
of the papacy, but it is your responsibility to search out the Lord’s
will and submit yourselves to it, rather than to relax the reins on your
desires. Even the example of infidels may inspire us with shame. Granted
that they did not show that reverence in their superstitions which we
ought to show in the sacraments; they nevertheless acknowledged that
those judged to be defiled by some crime should be kept away from their
superstitious rites.
When the Lord’s Supper is forbidden to someone,
he should not think that he is excluded for all time, or that he has
been thrown into a desperate situation. The purpose is for him to humble
himself, and for others to learn through him. All this is set forth
in the Word of God, and we ask of you through the Lord that you not be
ashamed to subject yourselves in a matter that you know to be good and
holy."